Current:Home > InvestJudge won’t block North Dakota’s ban on gender-affirming care for children -FutureWise Finance
Judge won’t block North Dakota’s ban on gender-affirming care for children
View
Date:2025-04-27 20:49:07
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — A North Dakota law banning gender-affirming care for children will continue to be enforced pending a court challenge, but any kids whose treatments began before the law took effect in April 2023 can keep getting the care, according to a judge’s ruling released Wednesday.
Judge Jackson Lofgren denied a preliminary injunction sought by families seeking to overturn the law, as he had previously done in November when the plaintiffs sought a temporary restraining order.
The plaintiffs said a grandfather clause in the law is so vague it led providers to stop treatments in the state, but the judge made clear those minors can continue any medical care they had before the law took effect.
It isn’t clear that the plaintiffs are “substantially” likely to win their case, now scheduled for a November trial, on claims that the law violates rights to parent or to personal autonomy and self-determination, the judge said.
He also sided against claims that the grandfather clause is unconstitutionally vague, and that the plaintiffs have shown irreparable harm. With the current law in effect for more than a year now, Lofgren said “the public interest in maintaining the status quo weighs against granting a preliminary injunction.”
The law took immediate effect when Republican Gov. Doug Burgum signed it in April 2023 after overwhelming approval by the GOP-controlled legislature. It makes it a misdemeanor for a health care provider to prescribe or give hormone treatments or puberty blockers to a transgender child, and a felony to perform gender-affirming surgery on a minor.
“The longer this law is allowed to remain in effect, the more North Dakota kids and families will be harmed by the state’s unfair, unjust, and unconstitutional denial of the essential and life-saving health care they need,” Gender Justice Senior Staff Attorney Brittany Stewart, who represents the families and a doctor challenging the ban.
Republican state Rep. Bill Tveit, who brought the bill, was pleased with the ruling. He said the law protects children from irreversible procedures.
Opponents said the ban will harm transgender kids who face greater risks of depression, self-harm and suicide, and stressed that no one performs such surgeries in the state.
Despite the exception for children who were receiving treatments before the ban took effect, providers have considered the grandfather clause too vague to risk it, so the plaintiff families have had to travel out of state to get gender-affirming care for their children, Gender Justice said.
The judge disagreed, writing that such children “can receive any gender-affirming care they could have received in North Dakota prior to the Health Care Law’s enactment.”
Gender Justice agreed that the clarification “paves the way for providers to resume care for these patients in North Dakota.”
“However, significant barriers to access will remain for most or all children and families seeking care in North Dakota, as doctors who stopped providing care to transgender youth may hesitate to resume care due to concerns over the serious legal threats posed by the law,” the organization’s statement said.
Twenty-five states have adopted bans on gender-affirming care for minors in the past few years, nearly all of them challenged in court. Arkansas is appealing after a court struck down its ban entirely. Courts blocked enforcement of the law in Montana. And the ACLU has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review whether the bans should remain in effect in Kentucky and Tennessee. The high court has allowed the Idaho law to remain in effect while lawsuits proceed.
___
AP writer Geoff Mulvihill contributed to this report from Cherry Hill, New Jersey.
For more AP coverage of LGBTQ+ issues: https://apnews.com/hub/lgbtq-legislation
veryGood! (82)
Related
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- Delaware lawmakers sign off on $6.1 billion operating budget for the fiscal year
- Prosecution rests in the trial of a woman accused of killing her Boston police officer boyfriend
- 'Bachelor' star Clayton Echard wins paternity suit; judge refers accuser for prosecution
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- Luke Combs Tearfully Reveals Why He Missed the Birth of Son Beau
- 2 teens on jet ski died after crashing into boat at 'high rate of speed' on Illinois lake
- Everything you need to know about USA TODAY 301 NASCAR race this weekend in New Hampshire
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce and when engagement rumors just won't quit
Ranking
- Small twin
- US Olympic track and field trials: 6 athletes to watch include Sydney McLaughlin-Levrone
- DNC plans to hit Trump in Philadelphia on his relationship with Black community
- Thunder trade guard Josh Giddey to Bulls for Alex Caruso, AP source says
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- 1996 cold case killings of 2 campers at Shenandoah National Park solved, FBI says, pointing to serial rapist
- Iowa trucker whose body was found in field died of hypothermia after taking meth, autopsy finds
- Lakers hire J.J. Redick as head coach
Recommendation
Could your smelly farts help science?
Delaware lawmakers sign off on $6.1 billion operating budget for the fiscal year
Joe Alwyn Shares Insight Into Bond With Sweet, Funny, Brilliant Emma Stone
Woman ID'd 21 years after body, jewelry found by Florida landscapers; search underway for killer
'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
Ice blocks, misters and dips in the pool: How zoo animals are coping with record heat
Who is Alex Sarr? What to know about top NBA draft prospect from France
567,000 chargers sold at Costco recalled after two homes catch fire